Boeing: Battery fix eliminates all risk of fire

Boeing 787
Boeing 787
Courtesy, Boeing

Boeing’s 787 chief engineer says the solution the manufacturer has come up with for the aircraft’s lithium ion battery guarantees there will never be a battery-related fire onboard a Dreamliner.

And in the same media briefing, given Friday morning in Tokyo, Boeing Commercial Airplanes president and CEO Ray Conner said he expects the 787 to be flying again in weeks, not months, and he fully intends to be on the first flight of a Dreamliner after the aircraft grounding is lifted.

Boeing 787 VP and chief project engineer Mike Sinnett gave a detailed description of the redesigned lithium ion battery system for which FAA on Wednesday approved a certification plan.

The Dreamliner has been grounded since mid-January after two safety incidents related to the aircraft’s lithium ion battery, one at Boston Airport and the other during a flight over Japan. A total of 50 787s around the world have been grounded since.

Sinnett said the combination of fixes for the battery and charger design and a new enclosure for the battery system was important “because it eliminates all possibility of fire.” Asked directly by an AFP reporter if he could guarantee there is no risk of fire, Sinnett responded, "Yes, I can. If we have a cell event, I am very, very confident that we will not have a fire as a result.”

The three-part solution addresses the battery design to further mitigate the possibility of cell failure, the charger operation, and also containment of the battery should a failure occur. A new enclosure for the battery system will ensure there is never sufficient oxygen for a fire to break out, Sinnett said.

The three layers of protection are designed to prevent the initiation of an event, its propagation and any impact on the aircraft. This involves battery and charger design improvements, a tighter voltage range, and enhanced battery and cell manufacturing processes and testing.

Conner gave strong apologies to the airlines impacted by the grounding and those passengers affected by the safety events. He said he anticipated the certification process to take weeks rather than months and added, “I fully intend to be on the first flight when that occurs.”

Sinnett acknowledged that a root cause for the two failures that occurred in January was still not known. “When we go back four or five years or even longer, the history of lithium ion batteries was very good and so I don’t think that our basic design assumptions for failure probability were incorrect.”

But having seen two events occur within the space of a few days, Sinnett said Boeing had taken the decision to develop a much safer solution that provides multiple layers of redundancy rather than look for a specific root cause fix.

Discuss this Article 2

Night Watchman
on Mar 17, 2013

Please forgive me if this appears as a repeat of an earlier comment. There is no intention to "flood".
-----------

Good-day !
Great News ! Our dreams come true !

---------------
--'Boeing’s 787 chief engineer says that the solution the manufacturer has come up with for the aircraft’s lithium ion battery guarantees there will never be a battery-related fire onboard a Dreamliner.'
---------

But, wait a minute. Let's take a step back. This is not to knock Boeing ; most certainly not.

But those are "big words". That is a "massive" statement !

Let's hope that it never becomes a case of "Famous last words" !

We all thought that this was a given ("more or less") at certification. Such a GUARANTEE was implicit, if not explicit.

And even then, “first time round”, Boeing were a little more prudent, making the assertion that their.... “estimate of the likely frequency of overheating was ‘ONCE IN LESS THAN 10M FLIGHT HOURS, with overheating in a single cell not spreading to its neighbours’ .......".

So, what went wrong? Where lies the root cause of these battery fire issues ?

Now Boeing have taken it a notch higher, .... with a handsomely improved “estimate”,..... no? ... sorry, .... with a “FIRM GUARANTEE” : 'Boeing’s 787 chief engineer says that the solution the manufacturer has come up with for the aircraft’s lithium ion battery guarantees there will never be a battery-related fire onboard a Dreamliner.'

This has got to be a “big bucks” issue ! It is certainly a “big bucks” statement of guarantee.
Do we have it in writing ? After all, it is now broadcast all over the planet !

Does this mean that the “root cause” has been ascertained, and remedied ? It reads & sounds that way !

But, before we get carried away, ..... what do the FAA & BTSB have to say about his ?
This is not going to “go through on the nod”, simply because Boeing’s Chief Engineer (whose competence, skills and talents are absolutely NOT in dispute !) has said so !

But, alas, his “say-so” is not enough !
There is going to have to be a lot of testing before validation of his statement, and FAA “sign-off” !

---------------------

Surrounding and running through all this battery-fire issue is a major question of "big bucks". This, inevitably, pollutes the entire atmosphere, the whole ethos of the thing.

We have already seen the swipes taken at the "self-testing" and virtual "self-sign-off" on key points inherent in the certification process.

One reader, TechGuru, wrote a very good piece, with accurate and explanatory details and key facts as to how FAA got into this "necessary delegation" frame.

But, at the end of the day, this self-assessment process is bound to take some hits. It is going to be bruised, and FAA & NTSB are not going to come out of this unscathed. They know it. And, quite rightly, they want to rectify swiftly, solidly & durably what really must be remedied. Especially the boss of the NTSB !

The CREDIBILITY of, and trust in the whole system needs to be restored fast and convincingly, ... to all the BEHOLDERS. Some vociferous NIH ("Not Invented Here") merchants are going to have to get used to that idea.

And Boeing, Airbus and all air-framers are going to have to take this whole chapter in aviation very seriously.

And that will be beneficial, for all concerned, including the paying passengers.

This population, like the crew, is not to be side-lined by all this arrogant and intolerant rhetoric of "you're not qualified", too often spouted out by those who may not, themselves, be all that "qualified", ... and certainly not in the big picture of air safety.

In that big picture, we are free to reflect, but we all need to be humble.

MONNIDES
on Mar 17, 2013

After 2 months trying to determine the root cause of the lithium batteries failure in Japan and the U.S.no results yet, it is now very unlikely they will ever find the cause, the best they can hope for is speculation

Please or Register to post comments.

Sign-up to receive our complimentary newsletter

ATW On-Location

Visit ATW at the Paris Air Show!
Booth:  Hall 3, Stand A-2


View all ATW On-Location

Recent comments

ATWOnline Marketplace - Buy a Link Now