The US National Transportation Safety Board issued a report stating the Southwest Airlines 737-300 that developed a hole in its fuselage in July 2009 while flying from Nashville to Baltimore suffered from "fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin near the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer."
Flight 2294 experienced "rapid decompression while in cruise flight at approximately 35,000 ft. when the fuselage crown skin ruptured just forward of the vertical stabilizer," according to NTSB. It said magnified inspections of the fracture area revealed "surfaces indicative of fatigue progress." During the July 13 flight, "the fatigue cracking penetrated the fuselage skin and created an approximate 18-inch by 12-inch flap in the skin that depressurized the airplane," the board stated.
At the time of the incident, "the specific area of rupture and skin cracking…was not subject to any inspection Airworthiness Directives or service bulletins," NTSB pointed out. Prompted by the incident, Boeing issued a September 2009 service bulletin calling for repetitive external inspections of the area in question to detect cracks in the fuselage skin of 737 Classics. FAA followed with an AD issued Jan. 12 mandating the inspections.
SWA said in a statement that it is in "full compliance with all new safety regulations developed by Boeing and the FAA and we thank the NTSB for its thorough investigation." It added it has "taken aggressive measures to incorporate additional maintenance inspections…in response to what was learned from flight 2294. Immediately after the accident, we increased our ongoing maintenance inspections in the impacted area to include recurring detailed visual inspections and non-destructive tests, with a goal to not only meet but exceed known safety standards."
Discuss this news 6
It would be nice to know how
By IcemanIt would be nice to know how many cycles and hours were on the airframe?? Iceman
I read this additional
By tulsa-readerI read this additional information about the cycles/hours in the Friday, 20AUG edition of the Tulsa World (Tulsa, OK) "Southwest got the plane in 1994 - it's much older than the average Southwest jet - and it had flown for 50,500 hours and made 42,500 takeoffs and landings before it sprang a hole in the roof, according to the safety board report. "
"Fatigue cracking of the
By SBH"Fatigue cracking of the fuselage skin near the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer" issued in the report on the Southwest B737-300, by the US National Transportation Safety Board, is the same words used by the US NTSB, when the same thing happened in the same area, on an Eastern Airlines B727-200 long ago. Boeing take note!!
The 737-300 is by now and old
By tripquote.comThe 737-300 is by now and old dog and should have been retired a few years ago.
At least the fuselage did not
By AnonymousAt least the fuselage did not rip open like it did with an Aloha Airlines 737-200.
The crown skin fatigue issue
By AnonymousThe crown skin fatigue issue on older 737 classics has been known for a long time. As previous noted, the rupture was much less severe than Aloha 737-200. Reinforcement of the area and more inspections have helped extend the life of the airframe, but inspections will not find every crack. Today's 737 NG's coming off the line since 1996 have much pretty much fixed this problem, but as with any aluminum skinned aircraft, they will eventually develop fatigue cracking. Better design and increased maintenance procedures are making the airplanes safer with each generation.
Post new comment