Boeing selects GE as engine partner for 777X development

Boeing has selected GE Aviation as the engine partner for its 777X development program.

Boeing said this week the next generation 777 is moving closer to be being formally launched. The 777X is expected to enter service near the end of the decade.

“This decision to work with GE going forward reflects the best match to the development program, schedule and airplane performance,” Boeing Commercial Airplanes VP and GM-777X development Bob Feldmann said in a statement. “We are studying airplane improvements that will extend today’s 777 efficiencies and reliability for the next two decades or longer, and the engines are a significant part of that effort.”

GE Aviation said in a statement that its study of a prospective 777X engine, called the GE9X, “has been underway for several years. The study is focused on an engine in the 100,000 lbs. thrust class and will offer a 10% fuel burn improvement over today’s GE90 engines.”

It said key features of the GE9X will include a 132-in. diameter composite fan case, fourth generation composite fan blades, a 27:1 pressure ratio high pressure compressor, a third-generation TAPS (twin annular pre-swirl) combustor, and ceramic matrix composite material in the combustor and turbine. As part of its ongoing study on the engine, GE said a high pressure compressor test rig is scheduled to run this summer in Italy.

Boeing noted development work on the 777X has included consultations with current 777 customers from around the world. “We have had strong and productive engagement with a broad set of customers in the marketplace to understand their future needs,” Feldmann said. “We are aggressively moving forward on our plan and will continue to refine requirements with customers.”

Discuss this Article 7

duplex
on Apr 26, 2013

GE90 is the best,most innovative,reliable and advanced technology engine in the world today so why Boeing should consider an alternative or a competitor ? this would only confuse or even annoy 777-300ER operators worldwide.

Night Watchman
on Apr 26, 2013

Your opinion is defeated by the facts.

RR engineers must be in fits of laughter reading your utter nonsense.

GE is certainly embarrassed to have you as a blind, undiscerning supporter !

duplex
on Apr 26, 2013

My opinion is supported by the facts.Don't worry , Rolls Royce engineers have long acknowledged the fact that they are the Number 2 in the world. You are pathetic in the truest sense of the word.

Night Watchman
on Apr 26, 2013

As usual, you are wrong.

But never mind.

RR & GE are laughing at you. P&W , too .

duplex
on Apr 28, 2013

If Boeing is having the GE90 as the exclusive powerplant for the new long range 777 models, then they are trusting GE on their quality and reliability of their engines. Rolls Royce is out of business for good.. Rolls doesn't have GE's cash to risk-share on the 777X and they obviously underestimated the huge success of 777-300ER.
Boeing signed a contract with General Electric to be the sole supplier of engines for the 777X aircraft, owing to GEs willingness to risk-share on the airframe part of the project, and sales of the aircraft to GECAS The GE90-115B is in a completely different category and should honestly be judged as such.

The entire GE90 serie has those 71 shutdowns in roughly 24 million flight hours. The Trent's 88 IFSD were accumulated in only 18 million flight hours. The Trent is a lot less reliable than the GE90 series.

And in the last 12 months Trent has had 3 IFSD whereas GE90 has had 2.....even though GE90 has 4.6 million FH compared to only 1.8 million FH for the Trent. GE90 flew 2.5 times as much over the last year and had fewer total shutdowns and the -115 had non...

Source: Boeing First Quarter 2011 ETOPS report.

Contrail
on May 2, 2013

RR will be # 3 in the world and may go the way of the dodo bird.
Just wait until Pratt scale up their GTF technology for the big airliners.
--------
The high cost of manufacturing engines in the British isles is going off the clock and the triple spool design is far more costly to manufacture than a twin spool engine. As well, the reliability of RR engines is inferior to GE and consume more fuel, and are more expensive to maintain.
-----------
I just read on another site that RR had 32 IFSDs in 2012 while GE had 15 and there are more than three times as many GE engines flying than RRs.

777 spanner
on May 8, 2013

Not talking sides in this, other than repeating my prev in another thread here - don't think these long term engine deals on airframe type are decided on mere window shopping exercizes.

Both GE & RR have well stablished engine families and both have exclusive partnerships on various airframes civil & military programs.

Just looking at one airframe, or airframe family and denigrating a manufacturer based on that is rediculous!

That said GE has a commanding position in the very large engine segment, that goes back to assuming the best performance position on long 767-300ERs & 747-400s. It would be very hard for any manufacturer to break into the follow-on program of the 777-300ER family i.e. 777X.

For those braging about GE, do you remember the GE Unducted Fan engine?

RR & P&W have had dominance in other sectors in the past and no doubt will continue to do so.

Please or Register to post comments.

Sign-up to receive our complimentary newsletter

ATW On-Location

Visit ATW at the Paris Air Show!
Booth:  Hall 3, Stand A-2


View all ATW On-Location

Recent comments

ATWOnline Marketplace - Buy a Link Now