Lufthansa sees CSeries fuel burn per passenger bettering A380, 747-8

Lufthansa believes that the 747-8, which will enter service late next year, will have almost the same fuel burn per passenger as the A380 on LH’s typical missions while the CSeries will outperform both.

“These are numbers on our load factors, on our network and in our configurations," Senior VP-Corporate Fleet Nico Buchholz told attendees at ATW’s Eco-Aviation Conference in Washington last month. He said the 747-8 will have a fuel burn of 3.51 liters per passenger per 100 km. while the A380 with Rolls-Royce engines, which LH also has ordered, will achieve a burn of 3.4 litersand the CSeries powered by the Pratt & Whitney PW1000G will burn just 3.1 liters on the same basis.

Lufthansa has more than €13 billion of aircraft on order but will not be ordering any A350s and 787s until next year, Buchholz told ATW's Eco-Aviation Today. “The majority of leverage into LH’s business case to acquire a new aircraft type is in the concept phase and this means being proactive as an airline early in the life cycle to gain the most ecological and economical benefit,” he said. Discussing the complexity of fleet decisions, he said there are many challenges to getting the balance right: “Homogeneous fleet versus operational flexibility, economies of scale versus product differentiation, fleet commonality versus risk mitigation/spread, and innovative aircraft versus low capital expenditure.”

He also urged perspective on the climate change issue, highlighting a Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 2007 report that claimed China’s 720-million-ton increase in CO2 emissions from 2005 to 2006 is greater than the total global CO2 emissions for aviation within the same time period. He added, “Cement production alone in China causes 550 million tons of CO2–which corresponds to about 80% of global aviation emissions.”

At the same time, Buchholz took aim at the airspace infrastructure in Europe. “The Single European Sky has been discussed for 50 years. We have 47 civil and military air services providers…Detours in 2007 resulted in an extra 468 million kilometers of distance wasting 5.4 million liters of fuel every day.” He cited the Paris-Munich route, which is 680 km. on a direct track: “The current route we use due to airspace restrictions is 910 km.” He added that on average, "airway distance increase due to restrictions is 15% for European flights and 4% longer for intercontinental flights.”

Despite the complexity of problems, Lufthansa has reduced its fuel usage per passenger by 30.1% since 1991 from 6.2 liters per passenger per 100 km. to 4.3. According to Buchholz, the 4.3-liter figure equates to 13 kg. of CO2 per 100 km., which equals the EU target for cars to achieve by 2015 of 13 kg. CO2/100 km. “Carried through operational improvements and fleet modernization, almost half of the growth since 1991 was CO2 neutral despite increasing airport congestion and holding patterns,” he told attendees.

Discuss this article 7

15 Jul20:22

It's a bit of a strange

By Andrewthion

It's a bit of a strange comparison between an intercontinental and a narrowbody.

Are they comparing for equal stage lengths?

Cannot wait to fly a C-Series regardless.

20 Jul05:09

Lufta, your comments are

By toyotaolympia

Lufta, your comments are about as useful as comparing how many C Series could rest on the wing of the 380 or the 747-8. The last time I heard labor was still the most important beyond fuel usage and distance the flight can travel. The C Series is valuable but comparing the two for efficiency is like comparing a knife to a hammer. Both useful but try slicing your steak with the hammer

20 Jul08:25

How much freight can a

By Jay

How much freight can a C-Series carry? I'm thinking less per passenger than either of the larger planes. The other commenters are correct. The C-Series will be a great plane, but a niche aircraft if Boeing and Airbus re-engine or better yet, replace the 737 and 320's with new models. If the Big Two cannot more nimbly, someone else will.

27 Jul15:44

C'mon guys, these comments

By Joe

C'mon guys, these comments are very appropriate and accurate. The only way to properly compare the efficiency is per passenger mile or 100km's as stated in this article. That's regardless of aircraft. Of course the C-Series will have a different role, but the main point, as the airlines and aircraft manufacturers make more efficient planes to cut down on fuel/costs/emissions, ATC is reducing any gains made by the completely inefficient system they use to direct aircraft--in Europe, and in my opinion, the United States as well. I firmly believe computers will replace humans in ATC centers; planes already talk to each other through TCAS, so the technology is not that far away. The "red tape", however, will continue to get in the way for the next few decades.

29 Jul13:29

Don't worry about these

By Peter

Don't worry about these calculations. The Flight crew will probably go on a strike for a raise and get the difference in their pockets. It has always been like that.

30 Jul02:46

LH is the only airline giving

By rudolf

LH is the only airline giving those numbers, based on their network. Until now the A340-300 was their most fuel eff aircraft, which was quite a surprise to me. With the, future, 30 km per liter they beat the most efficient dual engined car!

05 Apr21:36

. :)

By freteerremn

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
ATW encourages and welcomes the thoughtful comments on article content from our readers that add value to the topic. In order to maintain the decorum of this website, we request that language be kept polite and respectful. ATW will remove comments judged to be offensive, insulting or lacking in good taste. Comments will appear upon ATW review and approval.

Latest From Twitter