Congress overhauls pilot certification requirements, ups minimum to 1,500 hr.

The US Congress attached sweeping aviation safety reform legislation, including a requirement that all Part 121 pilots accumulate at least 1,500 hr. of flight time before operating a commercial flight, to its latest short-term FAA funding extension passed on Friday.

President Barack Obama was expected to sign the measure, which will keep FAA funded through Sept. 30, into law over the weekend. While members of Congress once again failed to reach consensus on a broad FAA reauthorization bill (agency funding has been extended 15 times since its authorization officially expired in 2007), both the House of Representatives and Senate forged wide agreement on revising pilot training and certification standards (ATW, May 1) in response to issues raised by the tragic Colgan Air Q400 crash outside Buffalo in February 2009 that killed 50 (ATW Daily News, May 27).

Of particular significance is that the legislation cleared by Congress will require all Part 121 pilots to hold an Airline Transport Pilot certificate, which demands that a pilot be at least 23 years old, pass a test demonstrating knowledge of the aircraft category and class he or she will be operating and have accumulated a minimum of 1,500 flight hr. First officers currently must have only an instrument rating and commercial pilot certificate requiring just 250 hr.

The new safety measures "will boost pilot training programs, combat pilot fatigue and dramatically increase requirements for pilots of passenger airlines to have more flying experience," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Commerce and Transportation Committee.

In addition to the ATP requirement, the bill mandates FAA "to create a comprehensive pilot record database to be maintained by the FAA for air carriers to track and review pilot work histories," establishes a task force to make recommendations on pilot education and standards and requires FAA to conduct a study on best practices "with regard to pilot pairing, crew resource management techniques and pilot commuting."

According to Rockefeller's office, the bill demands that FAA issue rulemakings "to ensure commercial air carriers provide pilots with: a) stall, upset recognition, and recovery training; and b) remedial training. This provision also requires the FAA to convene a multidisciplinary panel to study and report on methods to improve pilots’ familiarity with stick pusher systems, icing conditions, and microburst and wind shear events."

The legislation leaves it up to FAA to determine how to implement the ATP license requirement, giving the agency 36 months to develop a new standard.

Discuss this news 50

01 Aug23:53

Any idea if the ATP hour

By Ken Whitfield

Any idea if the ATP hour requiements will grandfather in those pilots today who have far less than even a thousand hours ?

01 Aug23:53

Any idea if the ATP hour

By Ken Whitfield

Any idea if the ATP hour requiements will grandfather in those pilots today who have far less than even a thousand hours ?

02 Aug01:28

Govt.subsidies needed to

By Benjamin

Govt.subsidies needed to encourage & push pilots to reach the certification requirements, not forgetting the pilot shortage in the very near future

02 Aug01:42

Once again, a ridiculous

By FrustratedAgain

Once again, a ridiculous solution that doesn't solve the problem. These new measures would have done nothing to stop the Colgan crash; the FO had 1470 hours when hired and over 500 hours on type!

When will Congress, FAA & ALPA grow up and start doing something about the real problems. Continuous Duty Overnights (CDO's, High-speeds, Stand-ups, Illigals, whatever you want to call them) are a joke to the industry and should be stopped immediately. What about minimum wage for pilots??? Hey ALPA, why was she (Colgan FO) making less than a McDolands employee after a University degree???

The real problems: FATIGUE & PAY. Fix that Congress, FAA & ALPA.

02 Aug02:45

Pilot pay (or lack of it) has

By B747-400

Pilot pay (or lack of it) has nothing to do with the Colgan air plane crash! (IF pay was an ISSUE, does that mean the Colgan crash would not had happend had the pilots been "paid better"??? We pilots knew the pay scale before hand and agree "voluntarily" to accept it as we all know it is a "spring board" to climb the aviation pyramaid to the majors....

I commuted when I was with the "commuters"... it was MY responsiblity and MY professionalism to make sure I arrive "early enough": to get enough rest before my duty. Even if that means to come one day early and sacrafice one day at home.

1500 hours as minimum requirement for Part 121 was the minimum requirement set by the company when I got hired by the commutuers... Today it may not be the "perfect" solution.. but it's "start"! (

Here is a different perspective... How would some of you feel if you knew some "asian" carriers has 300hr newly graduated Commercial Pilot License as your First Officer on B77& or B747-400 flying you across the pacific??? or do you prefer at least 1500 hr ATP???)... as a Captain on the B747-400, I choose the later any day!!

02 Aug03:06

This is absolutely absurd,

By Anonymous

This is absolutely absurd, but I think it will aid in pilot salaries long term.

02 Aug04:08

B747-400..Couldnt agree

By Will

B747-400..Couldnt agree more.However I will go a step further to ensure that foreign operators operating in the US airspace must comply with the standards as some of these foreign carriers hires these lowtime pilots who paid for thier type rating with 250 hrs and put them in the right seat as it is cheaper than hiring experienced pilots..Good start to clean up the issues

02 Aug05:11

I am with you on this one Bud

By Anonymous

I am with you on this one Bud

02 Aug06:48

I'm sure readers of these

By Dave

I'm sure readers of these comments are familiar with the MPL program being pushed by ICAO. I wonder what political pressure was brought to bear to essentially lock that program out of US commercial aviation. Unions anyone?

02 Aug06:51

A solution to a problem

By Sean O Brien

A solution to a problem causing more problem's in the future

02 Aug06:51

A solution to a problem

By Sean O Brien

A solution to a problem causing more problem's in the future

02 Aug07:52

36 months to develop a new

By Anonymous

36 months to develop a new standard!

02 Aug07:52

B747-400- Having 1500 hours

By Anonymous

B747-400- Having 1500 hours and an ATP certificate does not make anybody a better pilot. It is what has been achieved with those 1500 hours that matters. It is the training industry in the US that is at fault cutting corners and producing poorly trained and educated individuals.

Your example of Asian carriers with 300hr pilots flying as First Officers on B777 & B747-400 across the pacific shows an ignorance that is surprising if you are a current B747-400 pilot. These individuals have been trained as professionals to a standard that is way in excess of the American 1500 hour ATP. I would choose this quality everyday.

02 Aug08:02

I love all the crying I read

By Anonymous

I love all the crying I read here. The more the Government and ALPA screw things up the better it will be for pilots. The less pilots are out there the better it will be for pilots working the field. Supply and demand little children. As far as pay, that's what it's always been about children. Imagine if the Colgan pilots had money to get a room or a crash pad, not spend their time sleeping in a crew room? It's only about the money!! Are you going to fly for free? 747-400 you are so far from reality you forgot what it's like!

02 Aug08:13

My question is, how is it

By Anonymous

My question is, how is it that requiring more hours before becoming a caption, will decrease fatigue issues? Or do they only care about the captions and not the co-pilots who will be scrambling to make those hours as fast as possible?

The only way I see the fatigue issue being solved is if they make it mandatory that the pilots and co-pilots take an 8 hour break after around 18 hours of tarmac and flight time.

02 Aug09:27

I think the 1500 hour minimum

By Anonymous

I think the 1500 hour minimum time is a good thing, but what most don't understand is to get an ATP you need to have 500 hours of cross country time. Studies have shown that the average pilot will need 2,200 to 2,300 hours total time to get that 500 hours of cross country time.(Most will go the CFI route) So in the long run most pilots will probably have 2,500 hours before they get hired at a regional airline.

In the next 3 years as the age 65 retirement kicks in. Then within a few years we will have a pilot shortage. Many say they have been waiting for the coming shortage but it was here before. The airlines just lowered the standards for hiring. That is they hired the 500 to 800 hour pilot with a aviation degree. Now the cap will be much higher so that will create a shortage as long as the economy keeps up.

02 Aug10:09

This bill also requires the

By atpcliff

This bill also requires the FAA to have in place new Crew Rest/Duty/Flight rules within 1 year of the bills' passage date.

Is a 1500 hour pilot better than a 188 hour pilot (that's about the minimum time required to get a Commercial License-NOT 250)? It depends.
BUT, A SPECIFIC pilot is DEFINITELY better at 1500 hours/ATP than THAT SAME pilot was at 200 hours. This bill will also make earning an ATP more difficult than it has been, so more training/experience will also make that same, individual pilot better.

cliff
GRB

02 Aug11:20

Right On. Everything you

By S.W. Wessling

Right On. Everything you mentioned is a fact and needs to be addressed and corrected. If the FAA is afraid to take on the duty problems, why not just go back to the previous simple flight time and rest regulations.

02 Aug12:48

atpcliff- Under the FAA

By Anonymous

atpcliff- Under the FAA system the the 250 hour Commercial Pilot unless he continues his training will by the time he reaches 1500 hours not have gained any additional skills that would enable him to get his ATP without attending one of the guaranteed courses-what a joke !. To get to 1500 hours the traditional route in the USA would be to gain the additional hours as a CFI.
Those hours do not make a better pilot. It is all about quality time and not quantity.
The rest of the world will always look down on the USA with their substandard training methods. Not a good time for US pilots looking for the big job overseas.

02 Aug13:39

Be realistic. The only thing

By Anonymous

Be realistic. The only thing this would do is that people will add more fake hours to their log book. Instead of addind 300 they will add 700. I agree with training the right way from the bigining like they do in Asia.

02 Aug15:19

Good grief. Hours are accrued

By Dano

Good grief. Hours are accrued by time in the air. Accruing time in the air means that some sort of "experience" has been gained during that time. That's what I like about flying - it's always different even on the same route. WX is never the same, passengers, ATC demands, etc. Time logged is experience gained. Experience is what the 121 US carriers are selling. I'd say I personally like the thought of an RJ having at least 3000 hours and two ATPs in the cockpit. I think the American public deserves it. The Regionals' safety record pales in comparison to true 121 carriers and I'm sure, whether some of us want to believe it or not, it's due to the linear relationship of time logged and experience gained during that time logged. As for Fatigue - that's a factor for ALL pilots, regionals or the majors. Get over it and practice some self-responsibility, some professionalism. You want respect - earn it. The Colgon crash was all about experience. The Feds are hoping that in 1500 hours flying time MAYBE they'll end up with, at least a cockpit, that knows when to say NO! That's out of our league - we should turn back now - let's STOP the operation. Those are the thoughts a truly experienced pilot asks himself and the cockpit crewmembers when the deck starts stacking itself against mission accomplishment. I have 9 jet types and have been flying over 25 years. Think about what I've said my fellow pilots and I'm sure it'll sink in.

02 Aug15:39

What you describe is already

By Anonymous

What you describe is already in effect. We call it the hard 16. And once your ground and flight time reach 16 hours then rest is required.

However, think about what you have said after a 16 hour day (exactly 2 times the normal 8 hour workday for 'normal' workers) you propose 8 hours with which to rest, call the wife, workout, eat, relax, and sleep. At which point you would return to work where you are limited again to 16 hours!!

I have flown this exact schedule, even recently, it is completely legal and completely devoid of common sense. In two days time you do the same amount out of work as the average worker does in their entire work week, and I can assure you the operation that takes place 36 hours into a trip after just 8 hours of 'rest' is not safe.

Right now the only thing that stops this operation from continuing is a professional pilot raising his hand and saying too much. At which point he is sent home without pay with possible disciplinary action.

Upgraded rest rules is the single most important safety regulation that could pass right now, and until they do it is simply a matter of time before another Colgan shows itself.

BTW this doesn't even address the added issue of commuting, but if I can't live in my base and stay rested then making me move to my base will not solve this problem

02 Aug21:08

Pay has alot to do with

By nate

Pay has alot to do with things !! Pilots can't even afford to put themseleves up in a hotel when they are fatigued or sick! How about pilots taking financial issues to work and not even making enough money to afford to eat !!!!! This is happening. How about working five 16 hour duty days in a row while flying in the crap with many legs and this happens quite often...You say, "arrive a day early and you won't be fatigued" ya maybe on your first day but what about the others! Lets not forget what was said in the cockpit on the voicerecorders "I would have called in sick but I couldnt afford to" Yaun, Yaun, cough, cough, yaun, yaun!! Youre completely out of touch mr. 747 pilot who works does 4 trips a month and makes 200G's
!!

03 Aug06:39

Thanks for you comment! But

By B747-400

Thanks for you comment! But let me ask you.. before you go out and call people "ignorant"... Have you ever flown as a Instructor Pilot on B747-400 training any of them???..Have you "train" them in the simulator??? Have you flown as a CFI/II, Capt for the commuter and got hired by the majors in the U.S .to tell the difference of what we are discussing here?... If NOT.. then case is closed.

You are calling me "ignorant". (Hmmn... I wonder who really is "Ignorant". here... I respect all aviators as they share their comments and expereinces... even if i might not agree sometimes, but i think I am "humble" enough not to show "arrogance" in making "such" ignorant" comment..ie- calling people "ignorant"! Hmnn.. that makes me wonder about your "leadership", CRM, ability...) But,I will give you the "benefit of the doubt" that "one such "ignorant" comment does not determine your whole "airmanship."... but it does cast "a question mark"...

A healthy "discussion": in my ockpit is always welcome! Never pesonal attack.

I sense because you have been "trained" in "Asia" as a low time pilot and are "proud" of your "quality of training" there because you sense they are much more "higher standard"... and the training in the US is not up to par. Then let me ask you ths.. even with your utmost high quality training, do you feel more comfortable at handling the aircraft you are currentlly flying now as a 300hr as a newly first officer or after you have acquired 1500 hr?... (what you are referrring to that "flight time" is not of "essense" to determine a good pilot is true. NO one is claiming that here. But if you have been around the industry long enough.. CPL or ATPL is what we have to work with to determine a "minimum" entry level requirement. That IS the issue of discussion here.

Like it or not, EXPERIENCE does
count in our profession to make a competent and mature pilot, and TIME does play a important factor. (Quality of training, dileigent effort by the pilot are all important variables which also can not be igorned)

1500 hrs for entry level or quality of training?.. I choose BOTH!...

Fly safe!

03 Aug14:46

This will not just affect the

By Keith

This will not just affect the 250 hour new commercial pilot. This will kill the dream of an airline career for many, myself included. Several years ago I decided to make a mid life career change. With 1050 hours now I have worked hard getting prepared for the next hiring cycle with my sites set on a regional FO seat. At age 49 my time to make this move is quickly running out. With the passage of this misguided legistation my hopes of a career with the airlines just died. The additional finanical outlay and additional time required to get from where I am now to holding an ATP rating will put me well into my 50's, so that kills it for me. I am all for crew rest and safety but the ATP requirement for FO will do very little to increase safety at a huge cost to the future airline hiring pool. They will eventuly have to back off of this requirement as the current pool of 1500 hour pilots gets drained, but it will be to late for this hiring cycle and to late for me. This is more about protecting union jobs and pay scale than safety. This is typical knee jerk DC politics, but we should all be used to it by now for that group of morons.

04 Aug05:17

Mr. 747-400 pilot. I do not

By FrustratedAgain

Mr. 747-400 pilot. I do not in any way imply that you are ignorant. I respect the fact that you have had to trudge through your career and you have finally attained what many of us have wanted to. But the safety record tells the tale.

As a European Captain who is an America and "fled" the US Airline environment, I am happy to chime in with my experience. I have flown with FO's with 10,000 hours and are retired military and I have flown with FO's who joined our company after completing our cadet course with less than 200 hours. I must say, the guys who completed the cadet course are exemplary pilots and I am thrilled to see them on my roster each month.

Trust me, this was a big shocker to me too!!! It goes against much of what we are told to believe as American Pilots but it is true. They are fantastic pilots.

Do they have the same experience at 200 hours as they will after they've flown 1500 hours? Of course not. But, like all who join ANY airline (Regional, Legacy, etc), you will have a better understanding of that particular company's operations over time.

Again, it's not being said enough: THE FIRST OFFICER IN THE COLGAN CRASH HAD 1470 HOURS WHEN HIRED!!! Would the crash have been avoided if she had those 30 extra hours? NO!

The simple truth is that the safety record for US Regional Airlines are sub-par compared those those of international carriers. Most International Carriers hire and train cadets; it's a common international practice. In no accident has lack of experience been a factor for any of these international carriers. To focus on that issue in this case is to turn a blind eye to the main issue(s): Crew Rest and Pay.

747-400 pilot, I encourage you to look into the safety records and maybe even fly along on some of those companies that hire 200 hour FO's and see for yourself. They are great pilots and you might be surprised; I know I was.

You're welcome to my flight deck any time and I will introduce you to some.

04 Aug19:04

Hey captain "Sca...", who ass

By Anonymous

Hey captain "Sca...", who ass did you kissed and how many fences did u crossed already to land a contract job like that. Please tell me your name so I won't bother looking thru the list the next time commuting home.

07 Aug15:21

Way to go, brother! I agree

By Anonymous

Way to go, brother! I agree with you, completely. And, the fact that some of us make less than a McD's employee surprises the general public and lowers pilot morale while being pushed to our limits on duty time and flight time. If you were to ask a more senior, high time pilot from the old TWA, for example, he would've said that what we do nowadays was unheard of in his time. So, I agree that Congress, the FAA & ALPA, especially ALPA needs to figure something out and stop taking our money to blow on Holiday Drunk Fests that they call important meetings.

07 Aug16:02

Not so. Captain Marvin

By Anonymous

Not so. Captain Marvin Renslow had 261 hours on the Q400, 110 hours as PIC.

09 Aug21:21

Typical nonsense. For the

By Anonymous

Typical nonsense. For the life of me I cannot see how the fact that these people might've been hired with less than 1,500 hours has to do wth the crash. That crash was about not adhering to the principles. Things like lowering the nose when the stall warning devices are alerting you.

Both these pilots had well over 2,000 hours at the time of the crash, so we are talking about experienced people here who exercised bad judgment in the situation. Much of the world, including our own US military routinely places 250 hour pilots in jets and sometimes in jets filled with fuel and bombs and turns them loose.

This law is pure foolishness and in the long run the American public and aspiring airline pilots are going to be the ones getting screwed. Many who have dreams of entering the profession will be demoralized before they even start. This whole thing is rancid.

10 Aug07:05

These foreign pilots have no

By Anonymous

These foreign pilots have no where near the training that American pilots have. I have worked for two different schools, which trained Chinese pilots, they are very smart, very dedicated, and very inexperienced. They have severe deficiencies in eye/hand coordination on average. Most of them do not even know how to drive a car before starting flight training. They also lack an independent "rely on yourself" attitude and confidence to make decisions. America holds the gold standard on aviation, why do you think all these other countries are sending their guys here for training?

10 Aug17:06

This will significantly help

By Anonymous

This will significantly help those of us whom have chose this as a first career. By keeping 500 hour hires out of the equation current pilots will be much more valuable. Working for 40 bucks and hour going on 5 years has cotton old. Please understand that..I was personally hired with 1800 hours that didn't seem very difficult at all. I have seen quite a difference in a 500 hour pilot vs a 1500 hour atp.

17 Aug20:40

Yes, they will be

By Anonymous

Yes, they will be grandfathered in.

23 Aug13:54

I agree that 1500 hrs is a

By Roger

I agree that 1500 hrs is a bit stiff for someone just getting started, but if the pay scale were a bit better to get started (flight instructors and junior pilots) it might just attract a better quality pilot to start with.

I have over 19000 hours and never worked for the Majors. All of this time was instructing, charters, sight seeing, and agricultural.

I stayed with these fields, first because I enjoy instructing, but also between them I made more money than a First Officer in the Majors.

03 Oct18:18

I'm 16 years old, I'm

By Anonymous

I'm 16 years old, I'm currently a student pilot and I've been flying for two years. My goal when I turn seventeen is to get my PPL , IR and MEL add-on and eventually get my CPL at 18. After, I would like to get some jet time through a type rating course. I was hoping to go to college with all of this done and just do some time building , focus on a degree. After graduation I would have just turned 22, I thought of trying to get an interview with a regional and go from there. With this new legislation, I won't be able to get an interview with a regional carrier. It's a bummer since I am not going to be eligible because of my age, although; If all goes well I will have over the required flight time by then. By any chance, what are the typical requirements to apply for an FO job with a 135 carrier? Any advice , as to what I could possibly do ? I like to constantly stay ahead of my career planning.
Thank You,
_Victor

18 Oct04:57

This law comes from someone

By Edoardo

This law comes from someone with deep lack of common sense.
Rather than 1500hrs experience (experience?! Of 152 or pa28?!) it would make much more sense have stronger selections from fllying schools and airlines. Those pilots with evident lack of skills should be sent at home after no more than 1 retake.

14 Nov22:08

The 1500 hr rule will not

By flight school owner

The 1500 hr rule will not create an increase in safety. rather the desire of the pilot to be the best will be the determining factor. I have lost three CFI's in the last 6 months to the airlines. The had 2500, 1500 and 800 hours. the were all extremely professional in their approach to aviation. Each of them started as a 250 hours CFI and progressed to the level of professional pilot when they left us for the airlines. I wish each of them the best in their chosen field. None of them came from the big name schools that are trying to short circuit the rule with 1000 hours of classroom . there is no substitute for on hands experince. Pay is an issue for these pilots as they took a big cut in pay to go to the airlines as we paid them over double of what they will make at the regionals.

30 Dec23:34

I had 2500 hours when I got

By Airbus driver

I had 2500 hours when I got my first commuter job back in the early 80's. Problem today for new pilots will be getting the hours. Back in the 80's we had jobs like night cargo, flying canceled checks, a lot for Part 135 jobs flying light twins and CFI positions. Today, most of jobs for young pilots are no longer in existence. Student starts are way down, some colleges (DWC for example) have stopped there pilot training programs and with the increase in gas prices, training prices are going to make it very hard for new pilots. Cheaper to become a Doctor or a lawyer.

30 Dec23:47

If you are flying a 747-400,

By A Regional Pilot

If you are flying a 747-400, you are probably a little disconnected from the regional aviation world where the wages are still insulting.

Saying that we "pilots knew the pay scale before hand" but still get into the job, which is then somehow OUR fault that we get paid so little, is not only annoying, but insulting.

How fast we forget at the top, what it's like at the bottom. By the way, it's easier to fly a nice big automated Boeing than a small turboprop that flies 7 legs a day. Add-in not having enough money to eat right, which equates to nothing short of malnourishment--a factor that is rarely, if ever addressed--being in a stressed state of mind, thinking "I went to college, got the training, I've got a career as an AIRLINE PILOT, but how come I can't afford to pay my phone bill this month?"...

Come on. I'm just not going to listen to a guy in a nice cushy 747-400 seat talk about how "enough" my pay is.

LET'S TRADE.

31 Dec10:05

maybe the issue was the move

By JB

maybe the issue was the move (over the last 20 years ) of all the part 121 airlines to using smaller commuter aircraft for the medium size cities in order to increase the frequency of service. This is because they believe that they will get more passengers with 6 flights a day rather than 3 with a B737.

31 Dec10:55

"The legislation leaves it up

By Mohammad Syed Husain

"The legislation leaves it up to FAA to determine how to implement the ATP license requirement, giving the agency 36 months to develop a new standard."
Quality should have been given more emphasis over the increase in hours, however, keep your fingers crossed as the FAA was supportive, so let them implement for the concern of the majority.

31 Dec11:02

Quality should have prevailed

By Capt. retd S.M. Husain

Quality should have prevailed in this issue, however, the FAA ha been supportive and how this is implemented will be the key.

02 Jan21:23

To the anonymous person

By B767jetdriver

To the anonymous person thinking that the 300hr pilots have better training and professionalism than the American trained pilots: I'll start by saying this: YOU MUST BE ONE OF THOSE LOW TIME GUYS!! I agree that 1500hrs is not a magical number, but I can guarantee you that when you "mature up to a multi-thousand hour pilot" you will realize how a sub 1000hr or 1500hr pilot is not CUT to be a left seater on any kind of jet..let alone 300hrs!! I fly for a US major and consult for some foreign carriers across the world, let me tell you that in "theory" they are taught more than here in the US, but as far as "stick and rudder" there is no comparison...I really don't care to have an FO who knows what material was used to make the landing light toggle switch!
Any pilot in the US (including me) when fresh out of flight school wished to be like and envied our fellow pilots overseas, but when you acquire experience, believe me your perspective on the matter would change.

All foreign carriers that have low time FO's, their captains are in a way underpaid and overworked because they act as PIC and flight instructor...and if things go bad..he's on his own!!
Things are not perfect for us here in the states, but I have more confidence having my kids fly on a US carrier than most foreign carriers...now those though serve free booze in coach!!

03 Jan09:00

FAR 61.23 requires any pilot

By Dan

FAR 61.23 requires any pilot exercising the privileges of an ATP to have a 1st class medical. Does this mean that anyone with a second class medical will be restricted from the front seat? A SIC used to only need a commercial license which only required a second class medical.

14 Jun22:46

... if you knew anything

By Liat Piloy

... if you knew anything about aviation son u would know that the Chinese government are now stitching all their pilots to do canadian pilots license its more tough and the training is more thorough
u look at the safety record of the USA and compare it to that of Canada you will see why
ive flown with those same chinese pilots and someone of em were exemplary pilots some was in ti for the money but most did it caus ethey love flyign and wen you have a love for flying u just excel in wat u do cause its where your heart it
im the same pilot who finished flight school with 232.6 hours and went straight onto a Dash 8 because the country where im from you have to do an exam where you have to know the General in depth of how everything in a commercial airline works 8 topic with a pass mark of 75%, AC ELECTRICS, DC ELECTRICS, AIR CONDITIONING & PRESSURIZATION, FLIGHT CONTROLS, HYDRAULICS, THORY OF FLIGHT, PROPS, ENGINE , GAS TURBINE ENGINES - that was a general exam that u had to pass to be even considered for the job so i started out in experienced and so have all my other colleagues in the company i work for but yet still our company has a 0 fatality record and we've been flying since 1974 alot went to the USA for training but there is no way u can do from stratch to CPL/Multi-IFR in 6 months, to much info to process in that short space of time that why i will forever love the canadian sysytem the only school in the USA that has an extremly high standard in Embrry Riddle but the price is outta this world
im telling you the USA system ... they dont even teach you about an NDB approach wat rubbish is da u tell me u cant land at an airport dat has an NDB that is 10 miles away u have to go 65 miles away just so u can do ur RNAV Approach absolute rubbish
Experience is vital in this industry and the FAA system really isnt solid enough to guarantee it some that are serious about it come out great pilots but others they just dont know
so get ur facts right

24 Jun22:54

I am a 236 hour American

By Anonymous

I am a 236 hour American trained pilot. I just took my FAA Instrument Oral & Practical Exam. The first approach I was tested on by the DPE was an NDB approach (in detail). Every question asked on my test was scenario-based. It wasn't easy, but I did well since I had studied for over a year. The test lasted over 6 hours and I learned a great deal from the scenarios. Also, I am always asking "why" or "what if" questions in aviation. This has kept me safe and has come in handy when flying night IFR in turbulent and windy weather. I feel that I have had OK training. Overall, it has been up to me to study hard and think critically about situations. As far as the 1500 hour rule goes, I am 25, married and have an 8-month-old son and the airlines may now be out of reach. I have done the best I could, trying to get my ratings and hours over the past 7 years. The earliest childhood memory I have is being in a terminal and looking at a flight crew and knowing that at that moment I wanted to do that. Now, with low pay and the new rule, I may not see this become a reality.

28 Jun18:22

This 1500 hour rule should

By Low hour pilot

This 1500 hour rule should not even exist, but this is the result of what happens when you mix Politicians and Aviation in other words oil and water. Do some of these ignorant bureaucrats even know the going rate of flight time and the cost of an aviation education? I happen to know it way too well and telling me I need 1500 hours in order to get a job is insane. I graduate with 250 hours where's the 1250 supposed come from? How bout the scumbag politicians start paying for low hour guys timebuilding? But hey, life must be seen from a whole new perspective by those weasels and liars in congress that is not available to us commoners, Then again, these decisions come very easily and they forget to think about the average Joe when they have the luxury to gather votes and increase their salary 50k whenever they please

17 Aug06:40

Nice post on pilot

By flight academies

Nice post on pilot certification requirements. I read all above information, I really appreciate the writer for adding all the informative detalis on your site. ...

27 Nov16:09

I have a comment re the 1500

By bob

I have a comment re the 1500 hour rule.
i feel a full type rating (pic as opposed to sic) would be a better requirement than an atp. sic is just a sign off and one t/o and landing whereas a pic type is an actual ride with an faa examiner.
also years ago many countries (argentina still has it) what was called a first class commercial or comm a license. in argentina its 900 hours total with at least 25 hours multi , hold a commercial license and ifr and pass the atp written. this license allows you to fly f/o . then at 1500 you just do the atp flight test and issued the atp.
i think this would be a great compromise. 250 is too little 1500 is too much . like others mentioned, another 1000 hours banner towing or instructing doesnt make you a great pilot.
so the us could come up with a new license (call it whatever you want) for example , be the holder of a comm/ifr/me , have at least 800 hours and 50 or 100 multi and pass the atp written and some jet transition course.
so full pic type and a comm 1st class = my idea

19 Jan17:20

Really?! The foreign guys are

By ArmstrongPilot

Really?! The foreign guys are trained right here in the US. And in my opinion are trained a lot worse than the domestic students that fly out of the same flight school due to the time restrictions and the rush through attitude these flight schools have.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
ATW encourages and welcomes the thoughtful comments on article content from our readers that add value to the topic. In order to maintain the decorum of this website, we request that language be kept polite and respectful. ATW will remove comments judged to be offensive, insulting or lacking in good taste. Comments will appear upon ATW review and approval.

Latest From Twitter