Editorial: Safety First: Beginning and ending on the runway

It’s sometimes easy to forget that this industry, with its constant exposure to the impact of the economy, political upheavals, wars and other events outside of its control, has much to celebrate.

There are the constant technological “firsts” and the innovations in passenger service celebrated this month with our 38th Annual Airline Industry Achievement Awards. But above all, this industry’s most remarkable achievement is its safety record, which has now been maintained at around 4 accidents per 1 million departures for some 10 years.

Two reports underscore why the airline industry stands high above all others in safety. The US National Transportation Safety Board’s 2010 accident report and ICAO’s first-ever State of Global Aviation Safety report emphatically affirm Superman’s famous cinematic assurance to Lois Lane that flying is the safest way to travel. Statistically speaking, flying commercially is by far the safest way to get from one point to another.

Total US aviation-related fatalities in 2010 were 472, well below total fatalities from boating (733), rail (813) and roadway (33,883). To put things in perspective, 44 people died in bus accidents in the US in 2010 while 618 died in bicycle accidents. Some 4,280 pedestrians were killed in US road accidents in 2010.

Globally, ICAO reports there were 121 commercial airline accidents in 2010 compared to 113 in 2009. While that resulted in a marginal increase in the accident rate, from 3.9 per 1 million departures to 4 per 1 million, it is clearly an extraordinary record that has been achieved despite continued growth—worldwide scheduled traffic volume experienced a year-over-year increase of 4.5% in 2010, setting a new record of more than 30.5 million departures.

Still, there are areas of concern and the most critical of these is runway incursions and excursions, the number one cause of fatal accidents today. Given that by 2030, the number of departures is expected to reach more than 52 million annually, this is a serious issue that requires top priority. If runway safety is not addressed, the industry will not be able to maintain its stellar accident rate of the past decade.

As always, the industry is working collaboratively to address this issue. Led by ICAO through its Runway Safety Programme, there is a coordinated and global effort to improve runway safety.

But it now also becomes more critical than ever for governments and authorities around the world to understand the importance of airport and infrastructure investment—as well as the need for more urgent attention to speeding up the introduction of new-technology air traffic management systems such as NextGen.

That’s an industry lobbying task to secure the political support—and appropriate levels of funding—that are necessary to make this a top-level priority for all countries, whether in those regions like North America and Europe that are straining under congestion, or those regions with emerging economies and booming air traffic growth.

Without that level of prioritization, the unacceptable risk is that the world’s runways will not stay as safe as the world’s skies.

Discuss this article 4

01 Feb12:37

The potential for a high

By Signalcharlie

The potential for a high energy collision on a runway does not fit well with the lack of protections when operating on the runway service. Industry standards should be advanced so that all aircraft, personnel and vehicles utilize ground collision avoidance systems. As for excursions, standards should be developed that incorporate surface condition reporting, weather reporting, runway lighting and expeditious contaminant removal.
Industry has made great advances in many other areas with SOPs, TCAS, GPWS and windshear warning systems, etc...; the time is now to focus on improving runway safety.
kb

01 Feb18:11

As I believe it, this ADS-B

By Wayne

As I believe it, this ADS-B relies on GPS, which uses line of sight to satellites, and if the GPS fails, or is switched off or someone "zaps" them, then Multi-Lat, the back up system for ADS-B, will be used.

This Multi-Lat uses the aircraft Transponder, which most aircraft have. My understanding is that Multi-Lat requires more ground stations and is line of sight. So, what, it must be cheaper than the many billions for aircraft fitment of ADS-B.

I believe that some Airports have or are fitting Multi-Lat to minimize the number one Aviation accident, and that is, according to the article in ATW's Airport Today Editorial, Runway incursions and excursions.

The question has to be asked, why aren't the airports, or the World, fitting this "backup" system for ADS-B first, as ADS-B seems to be having some trouble with other people having use of bands close to the GPS band.

Aviation IS "SAFETY".

Maybe I am missing something. Someone please explain.

wsh

01 Feb19:06

Safety actually begins before

By FrostyChief

Safety actually begins before even getting to the runway, it really begins when we first start planning that flight, or when planning to actually perform maintenance on the aircraft, parking ramp, taxiways, and runway.
Safety has to work all ways, and attention to detail is mandatory.
It has to be an ingrained part of every member of every crew associated with the airlines, and airports, from the secretary working at the desk, in the airport office, to the crew in the cockpit of that airliner, and everywhere in between, and beyond.

10 Mar07:52

in spite of all the comments

By Anonymous

in spite of all the comments which are very positive i respect so much Karen's articles she is focusing in issues which are live and give in addition to summarize the details ,explain it with figures .Thanks Karen

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
ATW encourages and welcomes comments on articles that add value to the topic. Offensive and/or obscene comments will be removed.

Latest From Twitter