American, United file lawsuit to halt O'Hare expansion

American Airlines and United Airlines this week filed a lawsuit in Illinois to stop the City of Chicago from moving forward with the second phase of Chicago O'Hare expansion, arguing that the city government failed to get clearance from the carriers before approving $3.4 billion in modernization projects at the busy airport.

The crux of the dispute is whether the airlines, by far ORD's two largest tenants, are entitled to have veto power over large capital expenditures at the airport. AA and UA state in the suit that they do, noting that much of the cost of expansion will be passed on to them via landing fees and other charges. "Although the city's position presupposes a 'blank check' from the airlines, the parties agreed in their contracts to a 'check and balance' that prohibits the city from saddling O'Hare with new capital projects and billions of dollars of debt without airline approval," the lawsuit asserted.
Chicago Dept. of Aviation Commissioner Rosemarie Andolino said in a statement that "timing is essential" and expansion needs to move forward: "The opportunity to realize the benefits … cannot be lost."

The airlines warned that "there will be no way to un-ring the bell" if expansion proceeds, burdening the carriers with heavy costs. "The projects will move forward at exorbitant expense financed by massive, unauthorized bond offerings," the suit claimed.

Discuss this news 3

20 Jan22:44

$3.4 bil is a drop in the

By Anonymous

$3.4 bil is a drop in the bucket for obama's hometown ; just have him come up with some funny stim. money.

21 Jan10:49

expansion eventually puts

By Jim

expansion eventually puts runway safety in peril with all runways east-west, planes will be off the side of the runways in winter or unable to land or takeoff due to crosswind limits on contaminated runways, more poor political performance in America, who gets the payoffs?

22 Jan16:08

Ever since this new

By Anonymous

Ever since this new commissioner was appointed, relations between the City and the Airlines are at their worst. Moving forward with a project that needs the backing of the airlines is needed in a environment of respect and trust. What the city is doing is neither.

Why bite the hands that pay for this. It's typical arrogance that going to cause the city to lose this suit.

UA is going to move plenty of operations from ORD to Houston, Denver and Washington. AA is already pulling back and reducing aircraft sizes which will lessen the PFC charges the city is planning on.

Delta will not increase operations and there won't be a large enough increase to International traffic to make up this difference.

I'm glad the airlines have said enough to the spend, spend, spend mindset of the city.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
ATW encourages and welcomes comments on articles that add value to the topic. Offensive and/or obscene comments will be removed.

Latest From Twitter