
Dreamliner launch customer ANA said in a brief statement Friday that the latest delay to the 787 program "is regrettable," while a Boeing official said the delay "is much less important than the thoroughness of the process that gets us" to first delivery.
Following an ATW Daily News report that 787 customer Kenya Airways had been informed by Boeing of a further three-month delay in initial deliveries, the manufacturer confirmed early Friday that first 787 deliveries would be pushed back to "the middle of the first quarter 2011" (ATW Daily News, Aug. 27). It had been targeting first delivery to ANA by this year's fourth quarter.
"The reason was a combined impact of several issues unrelated to the airplane's performance in flight test," VP-Marketing Randy Tinseth wrote in a Friday blog post elaborating on the manufacturer's statement announcing the delay. He noted that "just recently, Rolls-Royce experienced some engine availability challenges. The cumulative impact of this new issue, on top of the other issues, has led to our revising our expected timing for first delivery by a few weeks."
ANA said in an e-mailed statement, "Given the success of the flight test program so far, it is regrettable to hear of the delay. However, we trust that the time will be used to deliver the best possible aircraft in the shortest possible time-frame."
Tinseth said the 787 "program awaits a substitute [Trent 1000] engine from Rolls-Royce." Rolls had said the Aug. 18 failure of one of its Trent 1000 engines on a test bed would have no impact on the 787's EIS. Tinseth wrote that Boeing "will work with [Rolls] to address the contributing factors in the test incident." He added that 787 flight testing "continues at a healthy pace. We recently completed polar navigation and autopilot testing and wet runway landing demonstrations."
He emphasized that Boeing's main focus is on delivering a top-standard aircraft to ANA and other customers. "We've said it before: Building a new airplane is hard work. But the certification and entry into service has to be right…Clearly, first delivery will be a great event when it happens because we'll know that the airplane we're presenting to our customer is safe, efficient and reliable. In the big picture, the date of the event is much less important than the thoroughness of the process that gets us there."
Discuss this news 9
I am sure the flying public
By CabinCrewI am sure the flying public is very happy to hear that !
Boeing needs to learn a good
By EdBoeing needs to learn a good lesson here! There has been rumors for at least a couple of weeks that first delivery of the 787 was again going to be delayed but Boeing denied it. Then Kenya Airways breaks the news that there is a delay in first delivery. Then, Boeing makes this announcment that in fact there will be another delay in first delivery as if nothing happened. Boeing needs to be truthful and upfront with delays and any other bad news about the program. Building an all-new plane is tough and there are going to be obstacles but at least be upfront about delays and problems. Don't let someone else break the news about YOUR program.Your credibility is on the line. It used to be people would say, "I ain't going if it ain't on a Boeing," but now many airlines are probably saying, " We ain't going anywhere with that new Boeing."
"Rolls had said the Aug. 18
By airbusdriver"Rolls had said the Aug. 18 failure of one of its Trent 1000 engines on a test bed would have no impact on the 787's EIS"
Does anyone else have issues with ETOPs right out of the box for a brand new engine?
Well, ETOPS is a bit sketchy
By Bruce SanchezWell, ETOPS is a bit sketchy from the start, but yes, engines are much more reliable now. ETOPS with a new airplane and a new engine===priceless!
Bottom line is that the bottom line is more important than demonstrated safety.
Commitment. It has been a
By Ogenda C. OdhiamboCommitment.
It has been a good work that Boeing has kept that has made it rise to such a demand that bring delays, to me they should try and satisfy the demand for their products by investing on fast producing machines that will enable them to satisfy the current market demand. What Kenya is demanding, is just for them to satisfy her customer here in our country and also to trade in new emerging other African markets........therefore, for that case let Boeing understand our country's cause for cancellation.
Let's get it right the first
By TomLet's get it right the first time, before the first revenue flight! Face it, Airbus will have teething problems with the A350, another totally new design, and still have serious problems with the A380. Delays are inevitable with totally new technology such as these a/c!! insptom
most unfortunate for all.
By Ernest M. Schimmermost unfortunate for all. Boeing, Trent and
the airlines awating delivery....
Tom, your comment is very
By Alfred KapeletaTom, your comment is very right. Boeing [and Airbus] need to have their machines in good shape before they start carrying passengers. However, I think the mistake which Boeing is making is that they were giving customers hope that their aircraft would be ready by 2007, when they knew (although not with 100% accuracy) that there were possibilities of delays with completely new fuselage, wings, avionics, and engines. Giving a rosy picture of a quick delivery is what is forcing customers to begin questioning not only the 787 and 747-8, but also the credibility of Boeing itself.
I trust Boeing. Better safe
By nathanI trust Boeing. Better safe than sorry.
Post new comment