
American Airlines (AA) chairman, president and CEO Tom Horton outlined the bankrupt carrier's plan for emerging from Chapter 11 protection in a Wednesday letter to company employees, calling for $1.25 billion in annual labor cost cuts.
The labor expense reductions, which would likely cut about 13,000-15,000 employees from AA's roster of around 80,000 workers, will cover more than half of the over $2 billion in yearly savings the airline plans to achieve via bankruptcy restructuring (ATW Daily News, Jan. 10). Additional cost slashing will be realized through "restructuring debt and leases, grounding older planes, improving supplier contracts and other initiatives," Horton explained. AA is also seeking to generate "revenue improvements of $1 billion per year through network scale, fleet optimization and product improvements," he said.
The company will spend "an average of about $2 billion per year in aircraft, so that by 2017 American's mainline jet fleet will be the youngest in North America, with the versatility to match aircraft size to the markets we serve," Horton wrote. "This step is central to our transformation and means more profitable flying due to markedly improved fuel and maintenance costs and higher revenue generation."
AA has committed to a narrowbody fleet renewal (ATW Daily News, July 20, 2011) that includes 260 Airbus aircraft (including 130 A320neos) and 200 Boeing aircraft (including 100 737 MAX aircraft).
Horton said the Chapter 11 restructuring process "allows us to spread the effects of cost savings as broadly and evenly as possible, but there is no avoiding the fact that the cost reductions will be deep. And there is no sugarcoating the effect on our people."
He noted that all AA workgroups "will have total costs reduced by 20%, including management. While the savings from each work group will be achieved somewhat differently, each will experience the same percentage reduction." He called this approach "fair and equitable."
Discuss this news 27
How can a 20% cut for
By pgwroxHow can a 20% cut for everyone be equitable? 20% off the lowest paid employee is drastic while the same cut off the highest paid one just brings them in a lower tax bracket.
As a former Canadian Airlines International employee, when we were faced with a difficult financial situation, we had to invest in the company. To be fair, our employer declared that anyone who earned less than $25,000 a year would not be affected; from then on it went by $10,000 bracket, that is if you earned between $25,001 and $35,000 you contributed 2.5% of your salary and another 2.5% for every increment of $10,000, up to 20% of your basic salary. I would add that anyone who makes more than $200,000 a year could take a 25% cut. That was equitable and fair and AA should look at a similar system if it wants to maintain the dedication and respect of its workforce.
All of the employees of US
By Bruce SanchezAll of the employees of US airlines who have lived through bankruptcy know that it is the line employees who eat the bulk of the reductions. Management will keep most of theirs. "Fairness" in the US is a joke.
Well thought out system!!
By Aim HighWell thought out system!! But, unfortunately, AA will never approve of it!!! They is a reason why they are being called "fat cats" ..! Pity for the front line hard working, dedicated individuals. Management runs the ship aground, and front line personnel gets to pay the price!
Great idea, never will
By AnonymousGreat idea, never will happen! All pensions terminated except...executive pension! Once again Mr.Horton has lied, it should read AA seeks 2.8 billion per year in savings! I'll bet when management reductions are announced of the 50+ VPs none will be gone! The same VPs that got us to bankruptcy will be leading us out! Shameful! Why don't we look at cutting some routes that continue to lose money every day, nope lets keep are arrogant ego and "Worlds largest" attitude and continue to hemorrhage ! What do you do when your going broke....go out and buy new airplanes!! What a moral booster! Think its bad now, wait! Next flight when your at 33,000 ft remember your plane was worked on outside the US with little regulation! Enjoy you flight!
Like health care, the
By exairline mgrLike health care, the comments by pgwrox reflect the difference in attitudes toward working people between Canada and the U.S. In this country, those who can afford it the least usually take the biggest hit because they have no voice.They are the ones who pay for the years of mismanagement while the big boys get bonuses for being terrible at their job.
To suggest that an across the
By No one saw this coming?To suggest that an across the board cut is wrong is elitist at best. Who would decide who gets what cut? People deal better with a level fair objective solution then with targeted subjective ones.
There is no doubt that the most certain way to lose high talent people is to make their wages not equal to other jobs that are available.
If you made 100,000 dollars would you be inclined to take a 20,000 pay cut, have more work due to fewer staff and an uncertain future in bankruptcy OR leave? I am sure many who don't understand the competition for top talent will say, "good riddance!". But the reality is far more dire. Talented people solving problems on a daily basis are worth far more than their full benefit package or a business would not survive. Having said that, changes from direct compensation to incentives is a tried and true method to adjust pay structures. Please observe most of our software industry for an example.
Ever since deregulation the US airlines industry has been getting more lean, more responsive and more likely to fail without intervention. At the same time our rivals overseas have grown stronger, more financially sound and younger. Without some form of protection this scenario of mature domestic airlines cycling through financial chaos will continue. Upstarts will appear and their relatively low cost structure, due primarily to their age, will make the airlines with large ongoing overhead (and stable work forces) not viable. Take a lesson from the Chinese, again, limit new entrants. Let the stability of the airline sector be an asset to the country. Enable financially strong airlines to compete internationally. Provide some bedrock to make long term forecasts, which can not be done at this time due to the likely changes that government places on airlines all the time.
With that you will see smart people, who get payed for it, making our industry strong again. Without that and commensurate pay, thos people will find other sectors which are stable and anxious to have them.
Do you work for the Obama
By thank god not union any moreDo you work for the Obama administration? Sounds very similar...hmmm? Union tool bag.
I originally thought that AA
By AnonymousI originally thought that AA would stand a chance in BK. Not anymore. After hearing all of this I'm convinced that the unions would rather sink this ship that make a sacrifice to try to keep it afloat.
I live in Chicago, and will now focus on using United as much as possible.
Why continue to build up AA miles if they won't be around to use?
To suggest above, as certain
By IguanaDC3To suggest above, as certain bitter jealous (unionist?) laborers are, that only BLUE collar employees are the dedicated hard-working warriors for the cause is just dumb. Frontline labor is but 1 part of the equation. There's a REASON that most working folks opt not to be LEADERS instead, which in turn leaves it up to those who DO to step up & earn the honor of serving as a Mgr who leads others (hopefully by example). It takes BOTH.
Haven't you learned that by NOW ?!
And the aforementioned 20% cuts are labor force cuts, I suspect, more so than they're wage cuts. There just happens to be more worker bees on an airline payroll than there are leader types, so of COURSE the staff cuts will impact the lower ranks more so (in absolute numeric terms).
It's also delusional to believe that there's some kind of labor Nirvana in place up in Canada; there ain't, & there's certainly not one in China, either. There's substantial room for improvement all around the world w/in this biz', starting herein the USA, yes, but there are also examples right herein the USA where it's done rightly, too.
No need to seek advice from Beijing, Ottawa, or even Wash' DC right now. AMR can look across the street @ SWA or up at Alaska for the best examples currently available for viewing.
Great point. We are in a race
By rtgGreat point. We are in a race to the bottom. There is no protection from the govt, the company or the union. Safety is not part of the equation. Different rules because we fly freight??????? How blatant does the corruption have to get
Spot on. So until the
By rtgSpot on. So until the airlines are regulated again, aviation will not be a career. Corporations will play their shell game and continue to create new certificates. It takes less than 1 million dollars to replace any legacy airline's certificate. The current business model is to replace any employee that has more than 5 years with the company. Race to the bottom.....
Are those the same people
By MikeAre those the same people who's ideas put them in bankruptcy?
Next time you are at 33,000ft
By RetiredfromAANext time you are at 33,000ft remember that your plane had some work done on it outside the U.S. No matter what airline you fly. Also, anonymous parroting of your union non-leadership is boring.
What really should be noted
By AnonymousWhat really should be noted is the acceptance of a sham bankruptcy by a corrupt U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Mr. Horton
is pushing into a new frontier to see how much cash you can have on hand and still be allowed to filr for Chapter 11.
Since the is no debtor in possession financing I hope the PBGC and all vendors and parties the have a chance of losing hold AMR's feet to the fire in the bankruptcy court.
Filing 11 with over 4B in cash is over the top.
Good luck to all the employees and vendors.
Everybody's an expert! Only
By Frank BEverybody's an expert! Only one of the above (No one saw this coming?) has any business sense. If the rest of you were running AA with your lack of Business 101 behind you, AA would have been gone years ago, never to return. AA was negligent in not taking this action years ago and by waiting they saved many of your inflated salaries and those of your unions, so be thankful it lasted as long as it did. The air transport industry has changed & if the airlines, ground handlers, airports, etc. don't change with it, they die and someone else will take their place. It's an evolution that's not even remotely unique to airlines, it carries over to every other industry. If you were employed by an airline up until the 1980's count your lucky stars because you got to enjoy the "good old days". You need to accept the change & find a way to make the change work for you or find something else to do because the "good old days" as you remember them are gone forever.
I am very sorry I need to
By Ex AA-erI am very sorry I need to correct you. I myself was "made redundant" by American Airlines cost saving initiatives. Therefore I won't applaud any of the initiatives they're taking. I still have to point out that airline maintenance and repair is controlled by strict directives, no matter in which country they are being executed. The only regulations you can talk about there is social regulations. Yes, employees in Asia will work about ten hours a day 6 days a week. They still have to use the same rule book when repairing your plane, or your plane won't be allowed to fly.
Well, the AA employees are
By EX-NWAWell, the AA employees are lucky that Obama is in power and he has put an excellent man in charge of the group that heads up the government funded pensions. When AA did not hit their pension payment recently (supposed to contribute 97 million and only contributed about 7 million), the gentleman that runs the show there put a lean on assets of AA's in Latin America (i.e. not protected by bankruptcy) to the tune of $90 million dollars to protect AA employees that participate in their pension program. I hope the AA employees appreciate what the Obama adminstration is doing to support them. The unions are not killing the US airline industry -- nothing is that simple. In the case of NW, it was corporate raiders that sold off all the assets for a nice profit that killed it.
AA-CORP. MUST FIND WAYS
By Ernesto SchimmerAA-CORP. MUST FIND WAYS TO
Maintain all Employees finding ways
to improve service and use some
COMBI's on HUB TO HUB. 100% all
flites. 40% Cargo Rev. & 60% Psgr..
equals 100% ALL FLITES. I KNOW.
Frank and No one saw this
By AnonymousFrank and No one saw this coming, are typical middle level Mgmt. Today in america! Management should be rewarded for there business savvy, while the company is losing hundreds of millions of dollars! And the reason, we deserve it and we can't afford to lose our smart people! And the middle class take the beating, because there overpaid! Your comment that foreign carriers don't have these same problems shows how out of touch with the aviation business world you are. BA was shut down 2 different time by strikes because there CEO tried the same tactics that are going on in the us! QA CEO was so brash he shut down the company completely because he couldn't get his way. What did the Judge say your wrong and labor is right! AZ,LH, all have been shut down for hours and days due to wildcat strikes! So saying they run smooth is a lie! But I guess none of them are caused by management. I'm not saying because you sit in an office you don't work hard, but I've never seen an airplane fixed from behind a desk! The problem with business today is the lack of accountability! When I make the company serves me to the FAA for interrogation! When my fleet manager makes a decision that costs millions of dollars which he told won't nothing happens! So when I see CEOs these days wages go up from 52-233% I should just sit back and say "we need to roll with the industry"! My wage has gone down36% since 2002, how about yours?? Ahh the Good Ole days!
I am glad we established the
By AnonymousI am glad we established the following in this forum.
1. Everything is Obama´s fault.
2. Maintenace in foreign countries produces unsafe airplaines
3. Its the unions fault
4. It the managements fault
5. De-regulation is bad
6. We need more rules
7. "Good old days" are gone (Eastern, Braniff,etc.)
8. New airlines are not the answer. MD 80´s will come to the rescue.
9. If we would be the C.E.O. of AA we would work for $50K a year.
AA did take action in 2003
By AnonymousAA did take action in 2003 the employees gave back huge to keep AA out of BK.You need to review what took place after 9/11/2001 until now. But you're the expert.
Bankruptcy is a cop-out today
By AnonymousBankruptcy is a cop-out today for some corporations. It was inevitable for AA, because they had to file in order to try and be competitive with the other airlines before them who filed. It's in essence a domino effect. Kudos to AA for holding out as long as they did. One of the largest expenses for an airline these days is fuel. And nothing is being done about it's escalating costs. So, in return, the airlines go after what they can. As a result, everyone else, except the airlines protected and coveted executives, gets screwed. The suppliers, manufacturers, and employees will be screwed. The executives will get generous post bankruptcy bonuses for having "saved the airline". Followed by their generous salaries, to "retain top talent" of course. Sadly, the fuel is the immovable rock. Employee salaries are minute in comparison to fuel expenses, yet, airline management has shown time and time again that if they can shave their employees salaries, it's more money to go into their pockets. What people may not realize, is that this results in razor burn, in the form of more bankruptcies, and more foreclosures for the airlines employees, not to mention all the divorces that arise. People can't afford to make their house payments, car payments, and end up filing bankruptcy. The divorce rate increases after bankruptcy. Just ask any pilot or flight attendant who has been through bankruptcy, and they will tell you this happens. While this article applies to AA, this does not ignore the fact that other companies have filed for bankruptcy, or closed their doors during this recession. The impact of which is devastating personally and economically .
Isn't it the "Smart People"
By AnonymousIsn't it the "Smart People" who drove airlines into bankruptcy in the first place? There needs to be some give and take. And retaining top talent isn't only about pay. People have to love what they do and whom the work with also for a company to be successful.
A question for everyone above
By IguanaDC3A question for everyone above (including Frank, who makes good points but with the arrogance of a know-it-all, go figure) might be this: If every executive and every middle manager w/in an airline's realm was to have his/her entire annual pay & benefits package absconded by 1 of these socialist zealots who believe they've got the guts & brains to operate a large international business entity, & if ALLLLLL of that big money was then dumped into the general operating budget of their respective airline, just exactly how many days (it'd be more like HOURS) do you really believe would pass before that money ran out? It's this same jealous mentality which insists that if we'd just tax every cent possible from the "rich" herein the USA, there'd be fiscal peace & harmony for all forever, when IRS/Treasury & GAO stat's clearly indicate each year that ALL wealth from ALL wealthy citizens would combine to operate the bloated Fed' budget for all of 2.3 lousy DAYS.
Moral of the tale: Whine about exec' pay & bonuses, then do away with 'em ALL if you'd like, but at day's end you'll always still have the same problems which were rooted in place long ago & are endemic now, & re-regulating them (esp' via THIS President) ain't necessarily the answer.
ANYthing innovative or creative, perhaps, might stand a better chance of success.
Here endeth the lesson.
I'm always amazed at this
By AnonymousI'm always amazed at this comment that "......we have to pay more and ask for less cuts from these high dollar management types, or we will lose them to others....". I guess I'm just blind but isn't the economy still in the tank???Where are these super talented people going to go??? And weren't they in charge when this ship ran aground??? Why did AA let their pilots, until late October or early November cash out 100% of their retirement when retiring??? Seems like a way to increase your pension liability, doesn't it?? And yes let's address the issue of purchasing new A/C after you say you have no money????
In UAL's case they went bankrupt to get control of the company from the employees. I my self lost over $125,000 in ESOP stock, and was not able to write it off, the way UAL did during the ESOP. UAL management knew exactly what they were doing, with a plan in place, bankruptcy, when this was forced down the employees throats. They knew that at some point they were going to declare it, it was just waiting for the right opportunity. I caution ALL front line AA people to keep a very close eye on management, for they like all other large US busineeses do not believe you have a right to a fair and equitable wage and benefit package.
One more thing, has anyone ever noticed that American execs., NEVER go over seas to work???? It is simple they cannot make anywhere near as much money in Europe, the Far East, or anywhere like they can in the USA. But yet they want all middle class people to disappear. They are such a pain in the butt, wanting a fair wage and benefit package, the nerve of us, we should be happy rapidly sinking into Third world status.
Watch them Airline Execs., are the most grossly overpaid management in the world, with the least amount of performance .
Anon', NO one has a "right"
By IguanaDC3Anon', NO one has a "right" to a fair & equitable pay/benefits package. If it's able to be granted, it should be granted. In fact, everyone SHOULD (earn) one everywhere, no matter the size of their employer, agreed -- but it is NOT a "right" per se. That's a word which has been bastardized & mutated by those who go so far as to grant snail darters a "right" to exist even if it threatens to block progress for human beings. It ain't a RIGHT.
It looks like a class warfare
By ejdIt looks like a class warfare in those plenty-of-essays, in a way it might be just that...but it doesn't help the basic working-class hero who has to extirp the juices of high-school-educated brains (at best) to take care of expensive and fickle flying machines, their Serenissime Highnesses the Pilots, their imported baggage handlers running expensive equipment trying to miss aicraft, herd passengers (sorry: customers) at the highest quality standards inside the metal at the seats they don't like, and ....well you all know the show.
My experience around the world for almost 48 years now: if you are not a pilot or a high ranking (and lucky) executive, you are in the wrong rackett. You will ruin your health and your sanity, but you might be happy doing it. Just see history: The Transports realm doesn't make money, because your good three-mast clipper is too expensive to build, too expensive to maintain, the ports levy too high fees, Wells Fargo had to turn to the Financial realm because the ponies are too expensive and hard to feed, the trains have too expensive locomotives and tracks, so why would we be different?
We are not. The enterprises around us can thrive and make money with our help, taking fellows and stuff where they have to go, but we will always be made redundant after the height of the cycle because we accumulated pay raises and perks and pensions along the years that make us too expensive for the systems to entertain, and we must make place for the new. So if we are lucky, we have honest bosses who try their best to help us go by when they leave us on the side of the road, if not, we suffer the fate of the miners and the steel mill workers and all the hard working people who were before us.
Or we are born in China and we wonder about "provident funds" and the Rice Bowl Made of Steel our Party bosses had promised for all of us.
Post new comment