EASA: New cracks on 20 A380s ‘more significant’

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued an Airworthiness Directive (AD) Friday on 20 Airbus A380 after new cracks were found in wing brackets last week (ATW Daily News, Jan. 20).

EASA said in the AD that the “new form of rib foot cracking [Type 2 cracks], originating from the forward and aft edges of the vertical web of the rib feet “is more significant than the original rib foot hole cracking. It has been determined that the Type 2 cracks may develop on other aircraft after a period of time in service. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could potentially affect the structural integrity of the aeroplane.”

According to the AD, effective Jan. 24 the A380 aircraft that have accumulated between 1,300 and 1,799 flight cycles must be inspected within six weeks or 84 flight cycles, whichever occurs first after the effective date. Aircraft that have accumulated 1,800 or more flight cycles must be inspected within four days or 14 flight cycles.

An Airbus spokesperson told ATW in a statement: “Cracks have been found on some non-critical, L-shaped brackets (also known as rib-skin attachments or wing rib feet) inside the wings of a few A380s. The cracks are not on the wings; they are on a very few of the thousands of brackets inside some of the wings. The discovery of the cracked parts—and the rapid response to this by our airline customers, regulatory authorities and Airbus—demonstrate clearly how well the safety net works in this industry. Throughout the aviation industry, procedures are established to find such occurrences, and these procedures are working.”

Airbus said it “has established an inspection and repair program in conjunction with EASA that has been mandated now by the EASA Airworthiness Directive. The cracks do not affect the safe operation of the aircraft. We continue to work closely with EASA and our customers through the inspection and repair process.”

Discuss this news 27

22 Jan20:05

This goes to show that a

By Anonymous

This goes to show that a government subsdized company will go to any lengths to circumvent sound structural engineering to get a product to market. Airbus should be banned from further deliveries until it proves structural ingegrity exists in its A-380 fleet. At present, it clearly does NOT!!!

22 Jan22:01

When a wing falls off they

By Anonymous

When a wing falls off they will ground the plane!!
In the meantime the dollar overseas safety !!

22 Jan22:23

Regards cracks in A380 Boeing

By Maj JM Macfarlane, (ret)

Regards cracks in A380 Boeing had a 747 that was going
to Europe (LUF) and had two engines shut down and made
an emgcy landing at Montreal. They did not ground the
plane (big bucks over rode safety) ! That was 1970 era.
How do I know? I was there !!

22 Jan23:25

It means that the QF

By Anonymous

It means that the QF spokeswoman who made the media annoncement that the cracks were insignificant was telling porkie pies. There is no such thing as a crack that doesn't have some sort of safety implication.

22 Jan23:28

News reports in Australia in

By Anonymous

News reports in Australia in the past week indicate QF returned an A320 to the manufacturer due to cracks in the landing gears. No comment from the Australian regulator.

23 Jan01:04

These developments are

By Jacob Chisela

These developments are worrying at the very young age of the fleet of aircraft. Airbus are clearly taking a defensive position while EASA expresses caution to all. Let us wait and see what frequency of inspection comes out of this.

23 Jan02:52

History repeating itself.

By Anonymous

History repeating itself. When the B747 first started flying all the engine casings started becoming oval shaped causing many problems. But then too it was a storm in a teacup and soon resolved. Nowadays everything is more sophisticated and I trust the regulators when they say the aircraft is perfectly safe.

23 Jan04:18

As our trust in the A330-200

By Anonymous

As our trust in the A330-200 is not on the level it should be it was no big surprise to see Airbus fails again in the production of an aircraft which can be trusted after being in use of several companies. Can money be the only reason for customers buying Airbus aircrafts? I wonder at which stage quality and safety comes in. As you will understand it is important to see which aircraft you will fly during the booking proces of a ticket. Price doesn't matter, quality and safety does. Still feel comfortable on any Boeing aircraft but start avoiding Airbus aircraft. The idea of flying with an aircraft which has cracks in it's wings or brackets inside the wings is not really the way an aircaft should fly around. Bigger is not always better as you can see!

23 Jan04:43

Sorry, but this statement is

By evaluator

Sorry, but this statement is simply foolish. Failsafe design is an illusion. Operational stress can impossibly be completly forecasted, yet the early discovery of its effects, together with the accurate response of the authorities proves the safety network performs. Faults occur, not only in design, yet finding them is vital, before they become effective.

23 Jan04:47

This comment is ridiculous!

By Anonymous

This comment is ridiculous! First, the issue of subsidies has a) been argued long for and against BOTH Airbus and Boeing and b) has nothing to do with a company's ability to deliver sound structural engineering. Second, I do remember the FAA ordering,e.g., emergency inspections of 600 B737s due to faulty design of elevator mounting lugs - without anyone seriously thinking that Boeing should be shut down. These things happen, and that's why the FAA/EASA issue ADs to fix them.

23 Jan04:59

Composite material used on

By Anonymous

Composite material used on wings of such giant aircraft is the problem.. have nothing to do with government subsidies. Boeing too have composite on its Dreamliner, so keep a close watch on that aircraft too.
btw, Boeing too is on the receiving end of government subsidies

23 Jan05:01

Well said! If anyone

By Anonymous

Well said! If anyone remembers, Airbus A380 wings were failing earlier than expected during testing, and Airbus was able to get away with certifying the aircraft anyhow.

23 Jan07:45

Recall the wing loading test

By Bill

Recall the wing loading test failed to meet the 150% wing loading test or something like that. Airbus said aomething like "Close enough, we're not redesigning it"" It appearantly got bought off by Airbus. They will likely regret not taking a closer look then, but they likely didn't have time or budget (sarcasm inserted here), besides Boeing is doing the 747-8.......

23 Jan10:26

So -- fuselage skins

By Anonymous

So -- fuselage skins stripping off B737s, not to mention rudders locking over, are proof that Boeing is a government-subsidized company?

23 Jan10:54

The 747 example lost 50% of

By Anonymous

The 747 example lost 50% of engine operation, and the engine manufacturers should surely be investigated to determine cause. If the A380 lost 50% of its wing's operation, the result would be absolutely catestrophic!! Huge difference.

23 Jan11:09

The wing load test failed a

By Anonymous

The wing load test failed a couple of % below the 150% requirement and the wings were strenghtened to meet the goal. All aircraft are designed based on previous experience of loads, stresses, endurance and co mputer modelling.

In turn, ALL new aircraft are modifiied to 'design-out' in-service discoverables. This is one of those, and will show up on the 787, 747 and in turn the A350 etc. as they gothrough the rigors of intended life and function. It's part of the design process.

23 Jan11:48

By George! I think youve got

By Skedguy

By George! I think youve got it. Why do you think Boeing residual values are so much better than the Busses' ?

23 Jan11:52

This was in 1970 ,the

By Monnides

This was in 1970 ,the technology has improved in 40 years, there are no excuse for the A-380 problems

23 Jan13:33

Unless I have missed

By Anonymous

Unless I have missed something in this whole thing, the original find on these cracks was on the Qantas 380 being repaired after the engine blowout, where they had some disassembly. Had that not happened, unless I am mistaken, they wouldn't have been found/see until later down the line at an inspection.

23 Jan16:08

The significance of these

By Richard

The significance of these statements is lost in the emotional arguments of Airbus vs Boeing.

The sorry state of affairs is that Airbus claimed it was not an airworthiness issue, yet EASA mandates an AD. That is surely a sign that Airbus was attempting to mitigate the public relations damage, at the expense of air safety?

That is really sad, as it reminds me of AF447 A330-200 falling out of the sky, and they want to blame the pilots!

23 Jan17:33

The FAA will cover for them

By Anonymous

The FAA will cover for them just like on the A300. Instead of telling the pilots to not use the rudder they will tell the pilots to not use the wings!

24 Jan02:34

Why are people jumping up and

By le bon vivant

Why are people jumping up and down for such a small issue? There are few thousands of ribs on the A380 and only a few are cracking, and besides that there are redundancies in airframe that will prevent a wing from just breaking off.

The A380 is still the biggest technological achievement in aviation history and will remain the biggest passenger airliner in history of aviaton.

Building an aircraft of that size and efficiency is still not withing boeing's possibility. Just look at how poor the economics of the 747-8 are.
Last but not least, before the turn of the century, the A320NEO will become the best selling aircraft of all times by virtue of its superiority to the 737.

Maybe that is what makes the american public jumping up and down about such a small issue.

24 Jan02:52

This comment has obviously

By Ray

This comment has obviously posted by a person who has little or no knowledge of the what civil aviation is all about except for the point of view of uninformed and generally ignorant passenger. A typical hysterical reaction produced by an uneducated mind.

25 Jan13:35

Biggest achievement in the

By Andy

Biggest achievement in the history of aviation? It's amazing how quickly the Concorde has faded from people's memories.

25 Jan18:17

haha, you must be joking.

By Anonymous

haha, you must be joking. I've worked in countless private companies and they all cheat, lie, hide, tweak, hype, and cut corners to deliver on the due date and on budget.

27 Jan16:57

As for myself, I have flown

By Anonymous

As for myself, I have flown th A380 several times already and I definately will keep flying this extraordinary aircraft!! The best, that the aviation industry has to offer right now!!! And for those, who like to panic and make people scared with their stupid comments, I have to say...get a life!!!! Does really think somebody, they would keep flying with it, if there would be a real danger for the passengers????

28 Jan01:24

@ le bon vivant "Last but not

By Anonymous

@ le bon vivant
"Last but not least, before the turn of the century, the A320NEO will become the best selling aircraft of all times by virtue of its superiority to the 737."

Since the "turn of the century" won't happen for another 88 years, that's really nothing to brag about ; )

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
ATW encourages and welcomes the thoughtful comments on article content from our readers that add value to the topic. In order to maintain the decorum of this website, we request that language be kept polite and respectful. ATW will remove comments judged to be offensive, insulting or lacking in good taste. Comments will appear upon ATW review and approval.

Latest From Twitter