
Airbus has ended almost 12 months of speculation and applied the blowtorch to Boeing by launching as an option the re-engine of the A320 family (but not the A318) with either the CFM International LEAP-X or Pratt & Whitney's PurePower PW1100G geared turbofan.
To be known as the A320neo, the aircraft will also come equipped with "sharklet" winglets currently offered as an option on new build A320 family aircraft. Airbus said the A320neo will offer up to a 15% fuel saving and will be available for delivery from spring 2016. The aircraft will have over 95% airframe commonality with the standard A320 family, with the new engines requiring "limited modifications, primarily to the wing and pylon areas." Airbus put the market potential at 4,000 A320neo family aircraft over the next 15 years.
In a statement, CFM International President and CEO Eric Bachelet said, "We are obviously honored to be part of this exciting program….This is a natural extension of the long and very successful relationship we have enjoyed with Airbus since the inception of the A320 family program in the early 1980s." The LEAP-X is also being developed for the COMAC C919.

Pratt President David Hess said, "We are very proud that Airbus selected the PW1100G engine to power the A320neo and we are committed to flawlessly deliver 100% of the benefits of this extraordinary new engine," which is being offered on the Bombardier CSeries, the Mitsubishi Regional Jet and Russia's MC-21 as well.
Airbus President Tom Enders said that the company is "confident" that the A320neo will be a great success across all markets and with all types of operators. "We are leveraging a reliable, mature aircraft and are making it even more efficient and environmentally friendly." The efficiency improvements translate into a savings up to 3,600 tonnes of CO2 annually plus a double-digit reduction in NOx emissions, reduced engine noise, lower operating costs and up to 500 nm. (950 km.) more range or two tonnes more payload, according to the company.
Enders also responded candidly to concerns that Airbus resources will be stretched too thin in producing the A320neo while coping with A380 production challenges and development of the A350 XWB. "Finding the necessary resources for the A320neo wasn't exactly a walk in the park," he said in a statement. "The enabler was to devise a stringent phasing of critical engineering assets throughout our various development programs and to optimize the management and organization of all our programs and R&T projects. Our international engineering centers, suppliers and partners play a big role in this."
Discuss this news 28
Boeing are too preoccupied
By AnonymousBoeing are too preoccupied with the 787 and 748 problems to devote any resouces to the 737. The US is getting left behind in so many areas. After reading the South West pilots have approved the 737-800 I have to ask the question; do the pilots work for South West or does South West work for the pilots ?.
This will turbocharge Pratt &
By anonymousThis will turbocharge Pratt & Whitney for the civilian market.
The next giant leap for Pratt will be to scale this engine architecture up for the big 'frames.
No Sir, the USA is not
By anonymousNo Sir, the USA is not getting left behind!
A new gen '737' will blow this old 320 bird away.
Timing will be crucial.
Are Rolls Royce starting to
By CodyAre Rolls Royce starting to get the shivers yet !
This is great news for
By RobThis is great news for Boeing. Let Airbus commit to keeping the A320 around for another 15 years and get to work on the all new 737 successor. Boeing will have to wait a while to announce though or Airbus will scrap the neo and jump on the bandwagon.
After all the problems and
By AnonymousAfter all the problems and late fees incurred on the 787 Boeing will be lucky to be around to put out a 737 replacement. More likely another tart over of an already obsolete, sad noisy old clunker. 737 NG 747-8 etc etc. Notice a trend?
Anon', the only obsolete,
By IguanaDC3Anon', the only obsolete, sad, noisy old clunkers around here are your baseless speculations & obvious bias in favor of Airbus a/c which are similarly aging by the block hour. Slapping a new powerplant & a fancy winglet on this boxcar won't help it to score anything near 4000 units while Boeing will in fact be leveraging the by-then popularity of its most recent projects which'll generate more than enough revenue to retire the superb 737 in favor of its replacement --- which, by the way, Boeing WILL be around to "put out" with great success around this big round rock, buddy.
Too the critics I say this,
By AnonymousToo the critics I say this, Why is what Airbus is doing with the A320 program any different than what Boeing did in the 90's with the 737 ...al a NextGen with CFM power plants and a 10 to 15% increase in efficiency.
Airbus has the advantage by mimicking Boeing (when it was still a airplane company).
The A320 frame is already comparatively advanced to the 737NG which itself dates back to the mid 60's. The 80's borne A320 incorporated FBW, Composite Material, etc. "new techonolgoy of the day"...so a better starting point, perhaps...advantage Airbus. 15 to 18% seems logical.
Boeing would be stretching the tin just a little thin...the bird is old....40+ years old.
Spring Chickens a side, I'm still hoping for the Sonic Cruiser...but I'm guessing these days Airbus will deliver it first...if not with a delay here and there.
And then there were two.... RIP McDonnell Douglass.
You just have to ask yourself where would Boeing be if they had invested in a 737 replacement 20 years ago. The plan then was to kill off the competition and increase the ROI. Shareholders are happy, no doubt the plan did work; they all go rich and moved to Chicago to build radar systems to protect the border from "aliens"...uh, I mean "terrorists" that doesn't work leaving the US taxpayers to foot the bill. I sure hope they invest the proceeds wisely. Maybe a new version of the 767?
Anyone got a clean sheet of paper?
I think that in a very short
By jgmantelI think that in a very short while we will see the 787 flying and shortly thereafter, the announcement of an entirely new airplane. Picture a plane the sized comparably to the 737 with similar capacity. That plane will incorporate the weight savings of the 787 and feature technology advanced engines. Picture a 737 weighing 15% less, flying 20% farther, on 15% less fuel. Then too picture Boeing allowing current 737 orders to be converted straight accross for the new bird. That is the future I see.
If unions still keep "company
By AnonymousIf unions still keep "company needs to comfort us" not "we need to comfort our customer" then the Boeing will be keep behind 4ever.....
"A new gen 737 will blow this
By Anonymous"A new gen 737 will blow this old 320 bird away."
Am I wrong or this statement does lack a bit of analysis? Just as a side remark the first B737 entered service in 1968 and the first A320 in 1984.
I would expect the next
By AnonymousI would expect the next generation 737 (Y1 of the Yellowstone project) to blow the current A320 away. Just like the A320 blew the 737 away over 20 years ago when it was introduced. Even the Bombardier C series makes the current 737 look ancient. China will also be a serious competitor to Boeing and Airbus in the not too distant future.
I visited a coach manufacturing plant in China recently. They churn out 1200 coaches every day, The production techniques in use makes the Boeing plant look obselete..
Airbus say development of the
By TorquelinkAirbus say development of the NEO will cost $1.3bn. An all new narrowbody would cost $6 - $8bn. Airbus's own studies show that the NEO will deliver at least 2/3 the overall economic benefit of an all new aircraft - assuming the new aircraft incorporated game-changing technology currently unavailable. Both Bombardier and Mitsubishi concluded that a composite fuselage for a short-haul aircraft would be heavier than alloy and incur more difficult to repair ramp rash. Consequently both went with alloy fuselages. Boeing abandoned their own 737RS (replacement study) only two years ago citing unavailability of "game-changing" technology - what's changed? If Boeing go all-new now they risk being trumped by a truly game-changing Airbus wihin 10 years who, in the meantime, will be increasing their market share with the NEO.
I agree with you. Any
By KarlI agree with you. Any Airbus is a piece of junk. It only takes a moron to fly an Airbus but a real pilot to fly a Boeing. "If it ain't Boeing, I an't going".
I think it's a smart decision
By LivingstoneI think it's a smart decision of Airbus to re-engine the A320 family. It's a reasonable small investment that still produces significant savings, efficency gains to the airlines for the coming years. It will also ease the pressure when they will design the nextgen shorthaul plane. Sort of like the A330-300 is bridging the gap to the A350. Boeing will be under huge pressure to produce something fast, if they don't want to loose market share to the more efficent Airbus and heaven forbid should Boeing run into similar problems like with the 787...
Again I'm struck by the
By Dinant van den BeltAgain I'm struck by the ignorance of some reactions, The only thing happening with the introduction of the NEO engine is increasing the fan diameter from 64 inch to 81, leaving this impossible for the 737 to follow giving the limited ground clearance of this old lady.
Airbus states that only minor modifications are needed on the wing and pilons.
This leaves Boeing with a hugh task, in the period they are busy with wrapping up the 787 and 747-8 programs, simultaneously starting up a successor for the 737, will put great strain on the Boeing organisation, because they probably will have to come up with a new airframe, where Airbus is mostly relying on external engine suppliers.
I hate the acronym OMG, but
By InsightI hate the acronym OMG, but Oh My God what a lot of emotional twaddle is written as comment. The only analytical comment is by Livingstone. To most of the other contributors .. Grow Up!
So Karl ...you think
By VicSo Karl ...you think Sullenburger and Skiles were morons ? I also suggest that if that ditching incident after a double engine failure had been a 737 it would have broken up on impact.
Let's hope they are still
By AnonymousLet's hope they are still around. Having flown both the 737 (3000+hrs) and the A320 (2000+and climbing) I would fly the 'Bus any day. It's a truly modern aircraft while the 737 is 1960's vintage with "fluffy dice" and Mag wheels. Putting winglets on an "old boxcar" sometimes works. Look at the NG!
If Boeing is doing with the
By Boro-visionIf Boeing is doing with the "Re-Engine of the 737s", it will be the fouth time. I don't think Boeing will do that. Moerever, they have tons of shits to clear in 787s & 747-8s. I thought IAE will be holding one stake in Re-Engine project. Airbus won't leave them out.
Airbus is spending only
By Tim V.Airbus is spending only 1.3bn$ for the NEO that will bring 15% sfc reduction from the engines plus another 3.5% from the sharklets!!!
Boeing can not mach these efficiencies even if it spent 3 times as much $$$!
With minimal investment Airbus renders the 737NG uncompetitive and is therefore able to launch an all new airframe at any pint in time that Boeing manages to launch a 737 replacement frame.
Rolls Royce must be really
By CodyRolls Royce must be really ticked off that Airbus launched the NEO without them in the picture.
Will RR eventually fade away like all other major industies have faded away in the British Isle? I have a hunch that this will eventually happen.
From a marketing standpoint
By SammyFrom a marketing standpoint the A320 family surely has the edge with this new development coupled with the ditching incident (not one life lost and the airframe remained intact)!
Airbus arrogance, at least as
By IguanaDC3Airbus arrogance, at least as manifested w/in this blog, is exactly that for which I'd be wishing if I were a Boeing exec' right now. Such arrogance in the past has bled BOTH companies yet they don't learn from it, alas. There's no way that Boeing will concede ANYthing substantive to Airbus over the long haul, rest assured. On the other hand, however, the Chinese et al will be all to gleeful to forge ahead & leapfrog the 2 stalwarts whilst watching them infight & self-destruct. Be wary of who the REAL "enemy" is out there...
Competition is great for a
By CodyCompetition is great for a better product.
Let's roll !
dear iguanaDC3: Do you realy
By Dinant van den Beltdear iguanaDC3:
Do you realy think the Chinese will conquer the world with their narrowbody? Where they have an A 320 factory in Tianjin, producing A 320 for the chinese market and are a major supplier to the A 350 program?
Are you porely informed or just a B enthousiast?
Oh, that's right. It's the
By AnonymousOh, that's right. It's the unions holding Boeing back. As if Airbus is just Union free. Those pesky Europeans and their slave working class. Get a clue.
Yes, it really looks as if
By LediardYes, it really looks as if Rolls has shut itself out here. But on closer inspection it doesn't look so bad. Why? 1) This segment of the market is well covered with the Leap X and the GTF already. 2)Even if RR had a competing product how much of the market would they get? No, let RR get on with the bigger frames. Are RR fading away from the Isles? Yes and No. They are gravitating more and more east as that's where they see more of a future.
Post new comment