FAA to close towers at smaller US airports starting April 7

FAA said it will begin closing 149 contract air traffic control towers April 7 to comply with mandatory budget cuts.

The towers scheduled for closure are run by certified FAA contractors at smaller US airports that mostly handle general and business aviation traffic, though a small percentage of commercial flights will be affected. FAA pointed out that it scaled back from its original proposal to close 189 contract towers to comply with budget sequestration, which mandates more than $620 million in agency spending be reduced over the next six months.

“We heard from communities across the country about the importance of their towers and these were very tough decisions,” US transportation secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.

“Unfortunately, we are faced with a series of difficult choices that we have to make to reach the required cuts under sequestration.”

The closures will occur on a phased basis over a four-week period. To comply with the sequestration cuts, FAA also plans to begin furloughing most of its employees—including air traffic controllers—for one day every two weeks starting next month, which it has warned will lead to flight delays.

Discuss this Article 5

japiv
on Mar 22, 2013

Unionism strikes again. This is the method for the Federal Government to unionize all FAA functions. Grow the government it is so efficient. Leon and Vladimir are cheering the FAA on.

Tristan
on Mar 23, 2013

@japiv; This has zero to do with "unionism" my friend. The budget cuts was approved by the Congress of the US through sequestration measures to cut government spending.
These cuts will affect local/domestic flights in the future, especially during the summer hours when the majority of privately owned small aircrafts deal with the reduced service. Place the blame accordingly.

jetblast
on Mar 25, 2013

Not a single FAA/union controller will lose his/her job and they won't even work on their furloughed day so they're not even taking a pay cut for hours worked. On the other hand, non-FAA/non-union controllers at 145+ airports will lose their job completely even though they are paid far less than their FAA counterparts.

How about having everone take a 2-3% pay cut across the board instead? Maybe this is what Obama meant by 'everyone paying their fair share'.

Goforride
on Apr 4, 2013

Cutting workers' wages across the board is the typical GOP solution. It is their usual interpretation of "efficiencies".

The budget cuts apply to departments, not to individuals. It's up to management to implement them wisely.

I doubt very seriously a union government employee working at O'Hare is likely to want to tear up his contract so a contract employer working in Nowhere, Montana, who only has that job because of pork anyway, can keep his cushy gig.

jetblast
on Apr 9, 2013

Stuffing the union coffers at the government trough and taking everything away from the non-union employees who also perform a public service is the typical liberal way. Keep the union campaign donations coming and push the others out of the workforce and possibly into government assistance programs.

It's not your call to determine whether or not Nowhere, Montana needs a tower or not. It's obvious that the FAA thought it was necessary at some point.

You've obviously never been to O'Hare's north tower...the poster child of "cushy jobs" if a controller has ever seen one. There's a reason we call it "the country club". It handles ONE runway and it's staffed with THREE union controllers. Talk about pork!!

Please or Register to post comments.

Sign-up to receive our complimentary newsletter

ATW On-Location

Visit ATW at the Paris Air Show!
Booth:  Hall 3, Stand A-2


View all ATW On-Location

Recent comments

ATWOnline Marketplace - Buy a Link Now